Response for February 4

In response to Alex's post on the 80/20 rule, I have to ask myself a few questions. First of all, Shirky states he believes that some blogs are not recognized the way they should be. However, one of the main reasons this may be true is that the key words do not match on the search engine? That could be a fatal flaw in the blogger. However, if the blogger doesn't find away to get attention form a search engine then it may not be the sharpest blog to begin with. Additionally, writing clarity and organization add to the readership. If I stumble across a poorly written blog, chances are I am not going to add it to my bookmarks.

Consistency and creativity are key features to keep an active blog readership. Many factors go into the maintenance of an effective blog. Take for example, the "beppegrillo" blog that has received so much attention in Italy and globally. There are daily posts, videos, and pictures to keep the audience coming back for more.

Shirky talks of a "preference premium," where a select few blogs gain more attention, overshadowing many other blogs. Do you think this premium is well deserved? Or are other equally as good blogs being overshadowed due to it?

One last question, if high quality blogs are overshadowed by these "preference premium" blogs, then how can the public find these blogs and recognize them as high quality as well?

On a related note, while researching for my paper prospectus I stumbled across a great website that breaks down some of the terminology and technical issues relating to how to "survive and thrive" as a journalist in today's world. Definitely worth checking out! It is called "Journalism 2.0".